NOW VIEWINGRecord
Explore

ENTITY · LAW POLICY

Broadcasting Commission 2009 explicit-lyrics ban

Well supported

Directive issued by Jamaica's Broadcasting Commission in February 2009, following controversy over Vybz Kartel and Spice's 'Rampin Shop', barring from radio and television any music or video depicting 'daggering' or sexually explicit acts, or glorifying the gun, murder, rape or arson (including 'bleeped' edits of explicit tracks); a landmark and much-debated attempt to regulate dancehall content on the airwaves.

At a glance

Type
law policy
Confidence
Well supported
Style, language, faith & wider culture

Connections

Watch & listen

Open source ↗

Slack song ban — 'Rampin' Shop' among explicit lyrics outlawed (Gleaner, 7 Feb 2009)

WEB · rights discovery only · press source

Jamaica Gleaner archive reference.

Source link ↗

In stories

Debate & reception

How people argued about the music — praise, criticism and public debate. See all debate & reception →

commentary

Do broadcast bans backfire?

A documented observation stated as contested interpretation: many commentators argue that banning a dancehall record from radio raises its street and sound-system profile, making censorship counter-productive publicity, while others maintain that broadcast standards remain necessary regardless of side effects. Sources: Jamaica Gleaner/Observer archives; Broadcasting Commission rulings.

Stance: censorship as counter-productive publicity vs necessary broadcast standards

debate

Banning the 'bleep': clean airwaves or absurd over-reach?

The 2009 rule barring even bleeped edits of explicit lyrics is stated neutrally from both sides: proponents saw a consistent clean-airwaves standard, while opponents saw an over-reach that pushed content underground and encouraged double versions. No verdict. Sources: Jamaica Gleaner archive; Broadcasting Commission rulings; Global Voices.

Stance: consistent clean-airwaves standard vs over-reach that pushes content underground