ENTITY · CONCEPT

Hi-fi flatness vs sound-system weight

Well supported

The contrast between the domestic hi-fi ideal of flat, accurate reproduction and the sound system's deliberately coloured, low-heavy voicing, two different goals for a loudspeaker that shape how each is designed and judged.

Share a memory Correct this record Add a source lead

At a glance

Type: concept
Confidence: Well supported
Era: Open era →

Musical & sonic elementsTechnology, recording & industry

Connections

In stories

Story · Well supportedThe scoop and the folded horn: engineering the slow, heavy bass

Why nearly every reggae sound rests on a folded-horn bass bin, and what its deliberate dip is for.

Debate & reception

How people argued about the music — praise, criticism and public debate. See all debate & reception →

debate

Tuned weight or accurate flatness: what should a loudspeaker do?

A documented aesthetic argument, framed from both sides: sound-system practice values a deliberately tuned, coloured low end, the scoop's heavy dip and 'Hertz over watts', as the right way to move a dance; a hi-fi and studio ideal values flat, accurate reproduction, treating the scoop's response as a distortion. Neutral framing; no verdict. Sources: Julian Henriques, Sonic Bodies; Sound Projects; loudspeaker-design references.

Stance: tuned, felt low-end weight vs flat, accurate reproduction